New
York Office Event, The University of Tokyo
The New York Meeting on Tropical
Cyclones and Global Storm-Resolving Analysis
Date: February 5, 2024
Hybrid format with The University of
Tokyo New York Office (https://utokyony.adm.u-tokyo.ac.jp/)
and the Zoom streaming.
Photo of the keynote speakers: Feb. 5,
2024, UTokyoNY office
This meeting is organized to
interchange recent developments in tropical cyclone (TC) research, particularly
focusing on future changes, evaluations, and management of the current risks
due to TCs. For this purpose, we would like to enhance the research activities
related to global storm-resolving models (or global km-scale models) to simulate
better and project TCs and understand their changes. The meeting topics
include, but are not solely focused on, analysis of tropical cyclones in global
storm-resolving models, future changes in tropical cyclones, seasonal and
sub-seasonal TC forecast, and hurricane risks in the future.
This meeting is the New York Office event at The
University of Tokyo and
is a part of the three-day workshop. This event will be held in a hybrid
format, allowing on-site participation at The University of Tokyo New York
Office and online streaming via Zoom. The Zoom streaming will be available for
viewing via recording after the event.
To participate online, please submit
the form below to register by January 31, 2024.
Zoom information will be sent to the
registered participants.
Registration for ONLINE participation
•
9:30-10:00
Masaki Satoh (AORI, The University of Tokyo, Japan): Global Storm-Resolving
Modeling Approach for Better Understanding of Future Changes in Tropical
Cyclones
•
10:00-10:30
Pier Luigi Vidale (National Centre for Atmospheric Science, Dept. of
Meteorology, University of Reading, UK): Cyclones of Tropical Origin in a
Resolution Hierarchy of Atmosphere-Only and Coupled GCMs
•
10:30-11:00
Adam Sobel (Columbia University, US): Uncertainties in Tropical Cyclone Risk
•
11:00-11:30
Suzana Camargo (Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, US):
ENSO Diversity Impacts on Tropical Cyclone Activity CMIP6 Projections
• 11:30-12:00 Kevin Reed (Stony Brook,
US): A Storyline Framework in CESM for Quantifying Climate Change Impacts on
Hurricanes
Abstract
of the presentations
Masaki Satoh
(AORI, The University of Tokyo, Japan): Global Storm-Resolving Modeling
Approach for Better Understanding of Future Changes in Tropical Cyclones
To
better predict the future changes in tropical cyclones (TCs), we need to
conduct global climate experiments using high-resolution models that can
represent the internal structure of TCs. Global storm-resolving models (GSRMs)
at the kilometer scale resolution and large ensemble experiments spanning
several decades are required. For instance, Yoshida et al. (2017, GRL)
conducted experiments over 5,000 years, but the model resolution was limited to
60 km. Conducting such long-term and large ensemble experiments with global
storm-resolving models is challenging, but it is the ultimate goal. Previously,
we have conducted 10-year time-slice experiments with a 14-km mesh global model
with NICAM. The significant outcomes include understanding the mechanisms of TC
changes, such as changes in TC size, TC seeds, and the relationship between
convective mass flux and TC frequency. Ongoing activities with GSRMs at
km-scale resolution include attempts to conduct a 30-year integration in
nextGEMS and EERIE, which plans for experiments with a subset of the 100-year
experiments. In Japan, ongoing efforts involve a 10-year 3.5-km mesh NICAM
integration. This presentation will discuss strategies for future projections
of TCs using GSRMs.
Pier
Luigi Vidale
(National Centre for Atmospheric Science, Dept. of Meteorology, University of
Reading, UK): Cyclones of Tropical Origin in a Resolution Hierarchy of
Atmosphere-Only and Coupled GCMs
Recent
events, and ongoing research, have brought into sharp focus the dangers posed
by Cyclones of Tropical Origin (CTOs) to the North-East United States (NEUS),
as well as the British Isles and Western Europe (BIWE). North of 30N, events in
the last ten years have been the most costly on record, causing loss of life
and widespread severe damage: Ophelia totalled $70m in Ireland; Sandy alone
totalled US$17bn in New York City; Henri and Ida in autumn 2021 caused $31-44bn
in losses around New York State. More generally, and despite uncertainty due to
decadal variability, there are indications that the number of CTOs reaching the
midlatitudes has increased, consistent with projections of CTOs making landfall
in BIWE, in the future. Future projections, despite uncertainties, highlight
the increasing likelihood of a CTO landfall over BIWE/NEUS. Even if such events
should be rare, the potential consequences are alarming; for instance, our
homes and infrastructure are not designed to resist hurricane-intensity winds,
nor the associated flooding. Although our weather-forecasting centres surveil
tropical weather, our early-warning systems remain largely untested against
CTOs.
Since
the early days of GCMs, Tropical-Cyclone-like vortices have been successfully
simulated in the right domains and with credible seasonality, as well as inter
annual variability, but the frequency/intensity relationship has only recently
started to look realistic in GCMs with grid spacing of 20km or less. Rapid
intensification also remains a challenge, even sub-10km, for many GCMs.
In
this study, we show some new results from an ensemble of simulations, each
lasting 34 years, with a grid spacing of ~10km. The most important improvement,
compared to its 20 and 60km counterparts, is the ability to simulate the most
intense phase of the lifecycle within the tropics. At the same time, careful
identification of the point of extra-tropical transition shows that there are
two maxima in the distribution of track densities: one in the tropics, for
warm-core vortices, and one in the extra tropics, in regions where
baroclinicity is able to re-initiate and sustain hurricane intensity cyclones,
albeit with hybrid warm-cold core structures, or even full transitioned into
cold-core cyclones. This new capability is crucially important for our ability
to correctly predict the current and future risk posed by CTOs to countries in
the extra-tropics, as it has been shown that the impact of each cyclone, upon
landfall, depends significantly on its morphology.
Adam
Sobel (Columbia University, US):
Uncertainties in Tropical Cyclone Risk
I will give an overview of our group’s recent work on tropical cyclone risk, with an emphasis on
projected future trends as well as, relatedly, assessment of the present
anthropogenic signal. A theme that has emerged is that more research tends to
increase our perception of the uncertainty, rather than decrease it. I will
focus primarily on two sources of uncertainty: 1) global tropical cyclone
frequency which to the best of our knowledge could either increase or decrease
with warming, and 2) the pattern of sea surface temperature (SST) change, which
strongly affects results for individual basins, but which is uncertain
especially due to questions about the equatorial Pacific. I will briefly
reflect on how we might deal with these uncertainties, and to what extent they
are specific to TCs vs. broadly representative of the problem of climate risk.
Suzana
Camargo (Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory,
Columbia University, US): ENSO Diversity Impacts on Tropical Cyclone Activity
CMIP6 Projections
The El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO)
modulates tropical cyclone (TC) activity globally. Given that anthropogenic
climate change can affect both ENSO and TCs, we explore if and how future
projections of the ENSO-TC relationship could be affected by ENSO
characteristics and biases in the CMIP6 models. In particular, we examine
whether the ability of the CMIP6 models in reproducing ENSO diversity has an
impact on their simulation of the ENSO-TC relationship. To this end, we analyze
large-scale environmental fields that are typically associated with TC activity
(e.g. vertical wind shear, potential intensity), as well as TC proxies, such as
genesis indices and the ventilation index in the CMIP6 models. We consider 45
CMIP6 model historical simulations and 3 future scenarios (ssp245, ssp370,
ssp585). We also include all ensembles available for each of the model
simulations. ENSO diversity in the models is measured by the nonlinearity
coefficient alpha described in Karamperidou et al. (2017) and is based on the models’ pre-industrial simulations. We classify the CMIP6 models into
3 groups, based on ENSO diversity: A (similar to observed), B (too weak
diversity), and A+ (too strong diversity). ENSO composites of the large-scale
environmental variables in the historical and future scenarios are constructed
for the 3 groups. We show that models in the A+ group have very different
future projections of the ENSO composites from the other two groups. While
future projections of the ENSO modulation of TC proxies for models in groups A
and B are very similar to those in historical simulations and observations,
this is not the case for the A+ models, which show significant changes between
future and historical patterns. Finally, we compare these results with those of
CMIP5, to determine whether these relationships have changed since the previous
generation of models.
Kevin
Reed (Stony Brook, US): A Storyline
Framework in CESM for Quantifying Climate Change Impacts on Hurricanes
Significant advances have been made in
storyline frameworks to quantify climate change impacts on individual extreme
events, including devastating hurricanes. Here we present the results of the
storyline methodology for various individual North Atlantic hurricanes (e.g.,
Hurricane Irma and Hurricane Ian) using the Community Earth System Model
(CESM). Furthermore, the implementation of the framework systematically
throughout the 2020 hurricane season demonstrates the feasibility of such tools
for operational applications more broadly.
The University of Tokyo, The New York Office (UTokyoNY)
ICCP-GSRA: International Core-to-Core Project on Global Storm
Resolving Analysis